What do you want us to build?

Let us know which features and capabilities Membership.io should build next.

Sort by Recent Activity in Discussions

bumps discussion thread to the top of the feed in home Part of the reason why Skool communities are so active is because SKOOL owners CAN add a discussion thread for every piece of content Then when someone comments on that piece of content, it bumps the discussion thread to the top of the feed for everyone else on the community home page currently, for membership.io: comments made on videos or other content will appear only under that specific content, while Spaces and Discussion threads have their own dedicated comment sections. This keeps everything organized and ensures conversations stay relevant to their respective topics. we need an option to allow the “comments made on videos or other content” to also appear on the Spaces and Discussion threads thank you

Harry Luk 8 days ago

2

Community

Approve/Deny Member Requests Option

It would be amazing to see a "member request" like what Skool and Facebook have on their platform for new customers wanting to join your hub. My customers get free access to my online community when they purchase their essential oil pack through me as a bonus perk. Because I don't charge them through Stripe etc, I currently have to get them to fill in a form, verify their details as a customer and then send them an invite link which is doable but very time-consuming. If there was a "join community or hub" button like SKOOL has and then a pop up with questions I have created for the customer to answer (example in images attached), we could then just approve or deny them. We wouldn't have to send an invite link via email if we didn't want to or manually add them ourselves for hub access. I know this might not be on the roadmap at all for Searchie and a bit to create but just wanted to put it out there for those of us with private free communities who don’t charge for access.

HeySJ About 1 month ago

Community

Way to anonymize people in group

For the community piece of a membership, is it possible to anonymize people? I run a cybersecurity companion membership. I have said no community because I don’t want people to accidentally share their cybersecurity weak spots in a group (as a cybercriminal that’s the first place I’d look for opportunities.) However, I also think it could be a good place for women small business owners to learn about cybersecurity together. Is there a way people could interact without exposing actual names/businesses? (Kinda the way kids’ platforms work where they have avatars and generated user names. In fact, this could give you a safe way for people to host kid memberships.) Possible?

Alexia Idoura 2 months ago

4

Hubs

LIBRARY FILTER: Ability to specify = WITHOUT [Content Tag]

It would be helpful to be able to search through files in the Library by using the Filter and set Content Tag exclusions. I.e. search for files that don’t have the specified tag/s, or no tags at all. (1) This would help us manage our file tagging. For example we apply tags when uploading a new file and this would be a way to check if that was done, and done correctly. (2) Also if we want to apply a tag to all files in a folder, and because there is no ‘Select All’ option (meaning we have to manually select each file), this feature could be used to double check that we have actually assigned a tag to every single file. (3) I also uses a series of tags to indicate the transcription review and editing process: Transcript-Raw Transcript-WIP1 Transcript-WIP2 Transcript-Complete It would be beneficial to see what files don’t have these tags, indicating that have slipped through the gap.

AliM About 1 month ago

2

Library